My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/10/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
9/10/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GORDON B. JOHNSTON, ATTORNEY FOR OSLO SQUARE SHOPPING <br />CENTER ASSOCIATES, APPROACHED THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE FRANCHISE <br />FOR SEWER AND WATER. HE STATED THAT EVERYTHING WAS IN ORDER WITH THE <br />EXCEPTION OF SOME CHANGES TO BE MADE ON PAGE 12. HE SUGGESTED THAT <br />ON LINES 11, 14 AND 15 THAT "AND SEWER" BE ADDED AFTER "WATER." <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INTERJECTED THAT HE THOUGHT IT WAS THE <br />COUNTY'S INTENT TO PROVIDE WATER AND/OR SEWER. <br />UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER THOUGHT THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE FRANCHISE <br />IS SET UP THAT AT THE TIME THE COUNTY HAS WATER OR SEWER AVAILABLE, <br />THE COUNTY WILL MAKE THE CONNECTION AND SERVICE THAT FRANCHISE AREA — <br />IT WAS UNLIKELY THAT IT WOULD BE DONE SIMULTANEOUSLY. <br />ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON FELT THIS PRESENTED A PROBLEM BECAUSE <br />IF THE COUNTY PUTS IN A WATER SYSTEM AND NEVER PUTS IN A SEWER SYSTEM, <br />THE FUTURE HOOK—UP CHARGE CAN SIT THERE FOREVER — HE DID NOT THINK <br />THE MONEY COULD BE DIVIDED. <br />UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER POINTED OUT THAT THE IMPACT FEES <br />WERE IDENTICAL. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING THE MISUNDERSTANDING CONCERNING <br />THE FEES, AND THE WORDING IN PREPARATION OF THE FRANCHISE DRAFT, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INTERJECTED THAT THE BOARD SHOULD ASSURE <br />THE DEVELOPER THAT WHEN WE DO HAVE OUR WATER SYSTEM AVAILABLE, IT <br />WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE TO HIM. HE ALSO THOUGHT THEY COULD BREAK THE <br />IMPACT FEES DOWN AND NOT REQUIRE ANY FEES FOR SEWER UNTIL THE SEWER <br />IS AVAILABLE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE WAS HOPEFUL THAT WE WOULD NOT LOCK <br />OURSELVES INTO ANOTHER SITUATION SIMILAR TO THE ONE EXPERIENCED WITH <br />KEEN S . <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE COUNTY MAKING <br />IT MANDATORY TO SERVICE WATER — HE FELT IT SHOULD BE AN OPTION AND <br />NOT MANDATORY. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE LEFT THE MEETING AT 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. <br />TO ASSIST WITH THE COUNTY ABSENTEE BALLOTS, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE WATER AND SEWER PROBABLY <br />WILL NOT BE PROVIDED AT THE SAME TIME, AND THE PURPOSE OF THE PARAGRAPH <br />IN QUESTION IS TO BUILD UP A FUND SO THAT WHEN THE COUNTY DOES CONNECT, <br />SEP 10 1980 13 BooK , 44 PAGE 448 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.