Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HIS ONLY CONCERN IS THAT <br />HE DID NOT KNOW WHERE THEIR EXISTING ALLOCATION OF COST BETWEEN <br />THE CITY AND COUNTY COMES FROM AND HE DID NOT KNOW THAT WE HAVE <br />ACTUALLY AGREED WHO PAYS HOW MUCH. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SIT DOWN <br />WITH REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS BEFORE WE SIGN THIS NEXT PHASE OF THIS <br />AGREEMENT AND BE SURE HE THOROUGHLY UNDERSTANDS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS <br />THEY ARE GOING TO DO FOR US. HE FELT AT THAT TIME WE COULD NEATEN UP <br />THIS BUSINESS OF THE ALLOCATION BETWEEN THE TWO AND WHAT IT SHOULD <br />BE. HE EMPHASIZED THAT HE WISHED TO HAVE ANOTHER MEETING OF THE TAC <br />COMMITTEE AND THE ENGINEERS. <br />ALL BOARD MEMBERS AGREED. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ASKED IF WE COULD GET AN AUTHORIZATION <br />FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN PROVIDING THE TAC COMMITTEE IS SATISFIED <br />WITH THE SCOPE, <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD NOTED THAT THERE IS A <br />LOT OF MONEY INVOLVED, AND THEY DID NOT FEEL DELAYING A FEW WEEKS <br />WOULD BE THAT VITAL. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT HE DID NOT FEEL WE <br />CAN AFFORD TO PROTECT AGAINST THE "100 YEAR FLOOD" FOR INSTANCE, <br />AND COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THERE HAS TO BE A PRACTICAL <br />COMPROMISE AND WE NEED TO BE SURE WHAT THEY HAVE IN MIND BECAUSE WE <br />MIGHT WANT SOMETHING DIFFERENT. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED COMMISSIONER LYONS TO PROCEED <br />ALONG THE LINES DISCUSSED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT BASICALLY THE <br />AGREEMENT IS NOT DIFFERENT, BUT THERE ARE A COUPLE OF MINOR CHANGES, <br />THE CITY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE INCLUSION OF ANYTHING TO DO WITH <br />THE SEWER IN PARAGRAPH Z. THEY REQUESTED THAT ANY SEWER SERVICE THAT <br />MAY HAPPEN, SAY 10 YEARS DOWN THE LINE, BE AGAIN SUBJECT TO THE UTILITY <br />ABILITY OF THE CITY TO PROVIDE. <br />HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY <br />81 BOOK 44 NaGE 661 <br />SEP 2 41980 <br />