My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
12/5/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:56 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� r � <br />MR. KONTOULAS NEXT REVIEWED CHANGE ORDER #12 - COUNTY <br />ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, WHICH COVERS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />ADMI�ITSTRATION BUILDING <br />CO # 1Z <br />Item 1 CP -27 - Additional- work required to provide $26,908.39 <br />suitable interior finishes to areas as noted <br />in this Change Proposal. <br />Item 2 CP -30 - Same as CP -27. 2,914.02 <br />Item 3 CP -32 - Brace existing damage at structural 1,723.15 <br />beam, move wall for AC unit and block up <br />window. <br />Item 4 CP -34 - Provide west wing penthouse for AC 10,876.76 <br />equipment per Clarification #5. <br />Item 5 CP -36 - Modify and provide hardware for 4,609.99 <br />aluminum doors per specifications and not <br />shown in Hardware Schedule. <br />Item 6 Block up an ope►iing and provide an aluminum 687.98 <br />framed window at Commission Chambers Hallway. <br />TOTAL $47,720.29 <br />ITEM 1 - MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT THIS RELATES TO HAVING <br />A FINISHED JOB, AND HE FELT HERE AGAIN, IT IS THE FAULT OF THE <br />ARCHITECT FOR INSUFFICIENT INVESTIGATION OR JUST PLAIN GUESSWORK, <br />AND THIS WOULD HOLD TRUE FOR ITEM 2 ALSO. <br />ITEM 3 - WE HAVE AN EXISTING CONCRETE BEAM THAT MUST BE <br />REPAIRED. MR. KONTOULAS REPORTED THAT NEITHER HE NOR THE CONTRACTOR <br />KNEW ABOUT THIS UNTIL THE PLASTER CEILINGS WERE TORN"DOWN. HE DID <br />NOT KNOW HOW THE BEAM LASTED ALL THESE YEARS WITHOUT COLLAPSING AND <br />STATED THAT THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE CLASSIFIED AS UNFORESEEN. <br />ITEM 4 - RE PROVIDING A WEST WING PENTHOUSE FOR AIR CONDI- <br />TIONING EQUIPMENT. MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT THE ARCHITECT -HAD <br />PROVIDED VERY LITTLE INFORMATION ON THIS; THE ONLY THING CLARIFIED <br />ON THE DRAWINGS WAS THE STRUCTURAL AND THERE WAS NO DOOR OR SIDING <br />SPECIFIED OR SHOWN. HE CONTINUED THAT IN HIS SCHEDULE OF VALUES, <br />THE CONTRACTOR HAD ALLOWED $6,500 FOR THE STRUCTURAL THAT WAS SHOWN <br />AND ALSO ALLOWED $2,500 FOR DEMOLITION OF THE OLD STRUCTURE. <br />�6 <br />DEC 51980 <br />BOOK 45 PAGE 414 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.