My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/16/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
3/16/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:58:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All adjustments would be effective during fiscal year 1981-82 beginning October <br />1, 1981, and would be subject to further review by the Board of County Commissioners <br />during it's budget review and approval process. There would be no financial <br />impact upon the fiscal year 1980-81 budget. The estimated impact for fiscal <br />year 1981-82 will be $388,077.00. <br />The Administration respectfully requests Board concurrence with the <br />above guidelines and recommends the Administration be directed to proceed <br />with preparation of the FY 81-82 budget, in accordance with these guidelines. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT ONLY THE MOST OUTSTANDING <br />EMPLOYEES WOULD GET THE 5% MERIT INCREASE, AND HE FELT THIS IS A <br />GOOD INCENTIVE PROGRAM. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK QUESTIONED THE KIND OF ANALYSIS USED <br />TO COME UP WITH THESE FIGURES, WHICH HE FELT WERE HIGH, AND WISHED <br />TO KNOW WHO DETERMINES PERFORMANCE, THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THE <br />ANNUAL EVALUATION OF EMPLOYEES AND HOW IT IS CARRIED OUT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY IS ONE <br />OF THE FEW THAT OFFERS A HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR THE FAMILY, AND <br />IN THAT PROGRAM ITSELF, THERE IS A BUILT—IN AUTOMATIC INCREASE. HE <br />WISHED TO KNOW IF WE ARE COMPARING OURSELVES TO LIKE GOVERNMENTAL <br />AGENCIES, ETC., NOT ONLY IN DOLLARS AND CENTS, BUT IN FRINGE BENEFITS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON AGREED THAT THE FRINGE BENEFITS WE DO <br />HAVE ARE EXCELLENT. HE NOTED THAT WE BACKED OFF THE 11.7% CONSUMER <br />PRICE INDEX AND POINTED OUT THE GOVERNMENT IS GIVING 12.6% ON THEIR <br />COST OF LIVING INCREASE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK FELT THAT THE BOARD HAD NOT BEEN <br />PROVIDED SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO REACH A DECISION AT THIS TIME. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS COMMENTED THAT WE DO HAVE TO COME TO A DECISION <br />ON THIS AT A VERY EARLY DATE BECAUSE WE DO LIKE TO STAY TOGETHER WITH <br />THE OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS; THEREFORE, UNLESS Wt SET OUR POLICY, <br />WE COULD GET INTO A HODGE PODGE SITUATION. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK <br />FELT THAT WAS -REASON TO BE ESPECIALLY CAREFUL... <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED, IN THAT WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT <br />AND EVERYONE IS LOOKING AT US FOR A COMPARISON RATE, HE WOULD LIKE <br />TO SUGGEST THAT WE BEGIN 1981 WITH A NEW DOWNWARD TREND. <br />57 <br />flBK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.