My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/20/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
5/20/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:07:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/20/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THEY WOULD GET TOGETHER <br />WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND COME BACK WITH AN ACTUAL PROPOSAL <br />ON WHICH THE BOARD COULD ACT. <br />CARL NASHNER, PRESIDENT OF THE MOORINGS ASSOCIATION, CAME <br />BEFORE THE BOARD STATING THAT HE SAW NO OBJECTION TO THE BOARD MOVING <br />ALONG THE WAY THEY WERE, BUT SPEAKING FOR THE VESTED PROPERTY OWNERS, <br />HE THOUGHT IT WAS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THERE BE A DIFFERENCE IN THE <br />COSTS IN THE ONGOING WATER COST AND THE AMOUNT TO BE RECOVERED BY <br />WAY OF IMPACT FEES. <br />DOROTHY HUDSON, WHO SPOKE ON BEHALF OF THE MOORINGS <br />DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, STATED THAT THEY WERE INTERESTED IN CONTINUED, <br />FULL-FLEDGED, FULL -LINE SERVICE. <br />EDWIN SCHMUCKER, INTERESTED CITIZEN, ASKED IF THE BOARD <br />WAS NOW CONSIDERING PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 AS ONE SINGLE OPERATION. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT THIS WAS A POSSIBILITY, AS THE <br />BOARD WAS TRYING TO FIND A WAY, AS ECONOMICALLY AS POSSIBLE, TO <br />PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SERVICE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK REITERATED THAT SEVERAL ALTERNATIVES <br />AND A RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE BOARD. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED HE WAS.AWARE THAT THERE WAS - <br />A DECLARATION OF WATER- SHORTAGE -BY THE ST, JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGE- <br />MENT -DISTRICT; AND POINTED OUT THERE WAS A $300,000 IMPACT FEE FOR <br />THE WELL SYSTEM ON THE 40 ACRE TRACT. HE FELT THAT FEE WAS NOT <br />SUFFICIENT TO HANDLE THE EFFECTS IT WILL HAVE. -ON THE. WELLS IN A ONE <br />MILE RADIUS,- DUE TO THE HIGH RATE OF USAGE OF THE WATER ON THE BEACH. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER PREFERRED TO SEE MR. MULLER AND HIS GR -OUP PUT <br />-IN-THEIR-OWN SYSTEM, BECAUSE HE -FOUND THERE WAS 'A GREATER TENDENCY TO <br />CONSERVATION WHEN THE SOURCE IS CLOSE TO THE USER. HE FELT - <br />CONSERVATION.WAS VERY IMPORTANT REGARDING WATER -AND HE D-I.D NOT -SEE <br />ANYTHING BEING DONE REGARDING CONSERVATION. - <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK DISAGREED. - <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD STATED THAT MR. MULLER-WAS-ON.LY ONE OF <br />:MANY DEVELOPERS WAITING- IN THE WINGS,- AND -WONDERED HOW MANY REVERSE <br />OSMOSIS PLANTS ARE WE GOING TO ENCOURAGE IF WE -DON T PROVIDE SERVICE. <br />MAY_101981- 43 oo 6 PAGE490 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.