6/3/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 31991 �o� 46 PAr,F 612 G. Surf and Raquet Club - Application for site plan approval -of 60 mid -rise con- dominium and 8 villas on approximately 10 acres was submitted April 3, 1981. The project includes water/sewer facilities, clijbhouse, and tennis courts. The average gross density is approximately 7.1 units per acre. This project was reviewed at the May 23, 1981 T.R.C. meeting, and is scheduled for review by the P & Z on May 28, 1981. 2. Alternatives and Analysis Staff is presently reviewing site plan applications which encompass approximately 187 acres of the total 316 acres included in the North Beach Rezoning. These applications contain a total of 2,127 residential units; all the densities are below 8 units per acre. Because we cannot provide a "conceptual review", there are effectively only 1,418 units under official site plan review. A - B. Riverbend Master Plan and Riverbend Unit I, Phase I - Indian River County has no legal mechanism with which to grant or deny "conceptual approval". Thus no action was taken on the Riverbend Master Plan. The Riverbend Unit I, Phase I has received final site plan approval. Therefore, neither the Riverbend site plan or the Riverbend Master. Plan is included in this analysis. C. Riverbend Phases I, II, III, IV - The follc-,iing items are -deficient or contain insufficient information for review: 1) The scale is not adequate for review of setback, building separations, R.O.W. widths, etc. 2) Parking is not clearly indicated in the phases west of A -1-A. 3) Location of fences is not indicate. 4) A 6' chain link fence in "urbanized areas" is inappropriate (exceeds height limitation specified in Zoning Ordinance). 5) Considering the amount of existing vegetation indicated on the east side of A -1-A, it is unclear why only.8 palms are to remain. 6) There is not enough detail concerning coastal setback, dune preservation, and walkways to allow review or evaluation. 7) The issue of developing in flood plain is not addressed. 8) There are no deceleration"lanes. 9) It is unclear what a "Lake/Retention" area is. 10) Culvert sizes are not indicated. 11) There is no indication of anticipated effects of such a large, single retention pond (Phase I). 12) The site of. -the approved Unit I, Phase I is not shown. 13) There are no detailed plans for draw bridge nor discussion of the impacts. 14) The capacity, depth, water circulation of the marina are not shown. 15) NO D.E.R. PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED for the marina. 16) Mangrove preservation is not addressed. 17) Utilization of Jungle Trail for access and marina channel cuts is unacceptable due to erosion and limitations of the right-of-way width. 18) The plans are not sealed by architect or engineer. 19) Landscape plan is inadequate. D. Beach Colony Master Plan - The applicant is requesting "conceptual approval" and the County has no legal mechanism to grant or deny this. E. Beach Colony Unit I, Phase I - The follo�,ving items are deficient or contain insufficient information for review: 1) The major collector must have a 50' R.O.W. 2) There is no indication at what level of development deceleration lanes will be constructed. 3) The streets are not named. 4) Total floor coverage is not shown. 5) Water/sewer franchise data is not provided. 6) Landscape plan does not meet Count, requirements. 7) Fire protection is not addressed.