Laserfiche WebLink
BOCK FAGE `�50 <br />4u� 1 191 <br />Alternative #2: <br />Request Village Green to fund 100° of the $65,100 cost for paving the 2,553 <br />lineal feet of Walker Avenue. <br />Alternative #3: <br />Allow Village Green to submit a petition for the paving of Walker Avenue with <br />Village Green providing 75% of the cost or $48,825. and the County paying the <br />remaining 25% or $16,275. Funding on behalf of the County to come from Road <br />and Bridge Department budgeted funds (account #004-214-541-35.39). <br />In being consistent with past County policy, alternative #1 is recommended by <br />the County staff. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS -AND FUNDING <br />The following is recommended: <br />1) Release of the $1,000.00 cash performance bond presently being held in the <br />County's escrow account. <br />2) Alternative #.1 requesting the developer to pay for those paving and drainage <br />improvements along the 2,553 lineal feet of Walker Avenue. The cost to the <br />developer is to be based on the percentage of front footage Village Green <br />o owns, or approximately 4,111.77 If., estimated at $52,423.86. The County <br />is to front the remaining $12,676.14 from the Road and Bridge Department <br />account #004-214-541-35.39. This amount may be reimbursed to the County - <br />once the remaining fronting grove property is developed. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER WODTKE, TO AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF THE $1,000 CASH PERFORMANCE <br />BOND, VILLAGE GREEN, PHASE III, AS OUTLINED UNDER RECOMMENDATION 1 IN <br />THE JUNE 16TH MEMO FROM ADMINISTRATOR NELSON. <br />A SHORT DISCUSSION ENSUED. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER SCURLOCK, FOR THE BOARD TO ACCEPT RECOMMENDATION 2 AS OUTLINED <br />_IN THE .JUNE 16TH MEMO FROM ADMINISTRATOR NELSON, REGARDING THE PAVING <br />OF WALKER AVENUE. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER FELT THE PAVING OF THIS ROAD WOULD <br />NOT CONNECT IT TO ANY COUNTY ROAD. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />