My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (13)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 2:16:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:02:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (13)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan 2030
Subject
EAR based Amendments Comprehensive Plan 2030
Chapter 12 Public School Facilities Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13465
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element <br />POLICY 2.4: The County, through its land development regulations, shall maintain a <br />school concurrency review process for all non-exempt residential projects. The minimum <br />process requirements are described below: <br />a. A School Impact Analysis is submitted to the County in conjunction with any <br />residential development application (such as a land use map amendment, <br />rezoning, site plan or preliminary plat). The School Impact Analysis indicates the <br />location of the development, number of dwelling units and unit types (single- <br />family, multi -family, apartments, etc.), and age restrictions for occupancy, if any. <br />b. The County determines if the application is sufficient for processing and, when <br />sufficient, transmits the application to the School District for review. <br />c. The School District reviews the application for available capacity and issues <br />either a conditional SCADL or a Final SCADL as allowed in Policy 2.3: <br />1. If capacity is available within the affected SSA, the School District issues <br />a SCADL verifying available capacity. Issuance of a Conditional SCADL <br />identifying that adequate capacity exists at the time of capacity evaluation <br />does not guarantee that school facilities will be available at the time of any <br />subsequent concurrency review. <br />2. If capacity is not available within the affected SSA, contiguous SSAs are <br />reviewed for available capacity. <br />3. If capacity is available in the contiguous SSAs, the School District issues a <br />SCADL verifying available capacity, noting the SSA with capacity. <br />4. If capacity is not available in the contiguous SSAs, then the School <br />District issues a SCADL indicating that the development is not in <br />compliance with the adopted LOS and offers the developer a 90 -day <br />negotiation period for identification of mitigation options acceptable to the <br />School District. <br />d. The County and the School District shall review mitigation options during the 90 - <br />day negotiation period. <br />1. Mitigation options may include, but are not limited to: <br />i. Contribution of land in conjunction with the provision of <br />additional school capacity; or <br />ii. Provision of additional Permanent Student Stations through the <br />donation of buildings for use as a primary or alternative learning <br />facility; or <br />Community Development Department Indian River County <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.