My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/15/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HE ESTIMATED THESE PROPERTIES WOULD FURNISH ABOUT 1.5 MILLION OF <br />TAXABLE VALUE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISPLAYED A MAP OF THE LIGHTS AS <br />PROPOSED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, CONVERSATION CONTINUED IN RE- <br />GARD TO THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, THE DESIRABILITY OF SQUARING OFF <br />THE DISTRICT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AND POSSIBLY USING 1.5 MILLS <br />MAXIMUM AS A SAFE FIGURE. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED IF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH <br />WOULD CHARGE JUST A FLAT MONTHLY FEE OR CHARGE FOR CONSTRUCTION, ETC., <br />AND THEN A MONTHLY FEE, ATTORNEY BLAYNE ,JENNINGS STATED THAT IT IS <br />JUST A MONTHLY FEE FOR THE LIGHTS AND MAINTENANCE IS INCLUDED. <br />DISCUSSION AROSE AS TO HAVING TO PAY FOR BREAKAGE OF <br />LIGHT BULBS, AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT ALL OTHER <br />LIGHTING DISTRICTS HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE BROKEN BULBS REPLACED. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE MEMO OF.ADMINISTRATOR <br />NELSON TALKS ABOUT ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF APPROACHING THE FUNDING - <br />AD VALOREM TAXES OR FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT. HE CONTINUED THAT WITH <br />THE NEW $20,000 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION, THERE WOULD BE NO MONEY COMING <br />IN FROM A LARGE MAJORITY OF THE HOMESITES, AND THE ENTIRE COST WILL <br />HAVE TO BE OBTAINED FROM COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OR THOSE WITH PROPERTY <br />THAT IS WORTH MORE. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS REPORTED THAT HE DISCUSSED WITH THE PROGRES- <br />SIVE LEAGUE THE FACT THAT THE MAJOR COST OF THE DISTRICT WOULD BE <br />BORNE BY THOSE WHO HAD PROPERTY VALUED ABOVE THE EXEMPTION, AND HE <br />BELIEVED THERE IS A VERY STRONG FEELING THAT THEY WANT THE LIGHTS. <br />HE AGREED THAT THEY ARE NEEDED. <br />PROPERTY APPRAISER NOLTE INQUIRED WHETHER ANY THOUGHT HAD <br />BEEN GIVEN TO ASSESSING THIS ON AN ACREAGE OR PARCEL BASIS. HE <br />NOTED THAT THE EXEMPTIONS WOULD NOT APPLY WHEN THE ASSESSMENT IS <br />BASED ON A CERTAIN AMOUNT PER ACRE OR FRACTION THEREOF, AND MORE <br />PEOPLE WOULD BE AFFECTED, THREE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS ARE ASSESSED IN <br />THIS MANNER, ONE BEING ASSESSED AT $6.00 PER ACRE OR FRACTION THEREOF, <br />AND MR. NOLTE STATED IT WOULD NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM FOR HIS OFFICE. <br />HE EMPHASIZED THAT IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE AN <br />$18,000 HOUSE AND A $20,000 EXEMPTION MIGHT STILL RECEIVE A SMALL BILL. <br />MR. NOLTE CONTINUED THAT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN PORT ST, <br />JUL 1 aoo 6 PAGE 859 <br />5 1991 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.