Laserfiche WebLink
CHANGE ORDER NO, 26 - COURTHOUSE (FIRE ESCAPE) <br />MR. KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT THE FIRE ESCAPE IS TO GO ON <br />THE WEST SIDE OF THE NORTH COURTROOM, AND WE MUST REPLACE THE FIVE <br />GLASS WINDOWS DOWNSTAIRS WITH WIRE GLASS BECAUSE OF THEIR PROXIMITY <br />TO THE FIRE ESCAPE, HE DID NOT KNOW THE REASON FOR THE WIRE GLASS, <br />BUT IT IS REQUIRED BY CODE. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED IF IT WERE POSSIBLE, SINCE THE <br />COURTHOUSE RENOVATION IS BASICALLY COMPLETED, TO DO THIS WORK WITH <br />A DIFFERENT CONTRACTOR. IT WAS NOTED THAT IT COULD BE DONE THIS WAY, <br />BUT IT WOULD JUST DELAY THE PROCESS. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT, SINCE WE DO NEED THE FIRE <br />ESCAPE IN ORDER TO MEET CODE, IT WOULD BE GOOD IF WE COULD TAKE <br />CARE OF THIS PROBLEM ALONG WITH THE CLEANING OF THE AIR CONDITIONING. <br />HE STATED THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS GIVEN THEIR.VERBAL APPROVAL <br />TO THE FIRE ESCAPE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDER N0. 26 - COURTHOUSE <br />IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,139.80, WITH THE NORMAL STIPULATION THAT BY <br />APPROVING THE CHANGE ORDER THE COUNTY DOES NOT WAIVE ANY RIGHTS IT <br />HAS TO CLAIM DAMAGES AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR OR THE ARCHITECT BECAUSE <br />OF OMISSIONS OR OTHER REASONS THAT MAY ARISE. <br />E00� <br />61 7 FADE 7 <br />