Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY ATTORNEY POINTED OUT THAT THE MEMBERS MUST CONSIDER THE <br />FINDINGS OF FACT, AND EVEN IF THEY DID VOTE TO GRANT THE PERMIT, THEY <br />MAY BE OVERRULED. ATTORNEY VITURAC NOTED THAT THE ONLY THING THAT <br />WAS NOT RELEVANT WAS THE PRIORITY OF ROADS; ALL THEY COULD CONSIDER <br />WERE THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR THE READING <br />OF THE BIOLOGICAL REPORT CONCERNING THIS PROJECT. <br />ATTORNEY CIANFRONE STATED THAT IF THERE WAS NO ONE IN THE <br />AUDIENCE WHO OBJECTED, THE REPORT COULD BE SUBMITTED INTO THE RECORD, <br />SINCE IT HAD ALREADY BEEN READ ALOUD, <br />MR. WILSON OF REYNOLDS,, SMITH & HILLS THEN READ ALOUD THE <br />AMENDMENT OF THE BIOLOGICAL REPORT, AS FOLLOWS: <br />35 <br />Boix 47 PAGE 454 <br />