My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/7/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
4/7/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/07/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The design prepared for the 36th Street roadway lighting is based on a residential <br />collector roadway classification and three alternatives are presented. <br />The recommended plan and Option #1 call for 11-16,000 lumen high presure sodiun <br />lamps spaced every 190' + apart using concrete poles (recommended) or wood poles, <br />(Option #1) for a yearly cost of $1,709.40 and $1,603.80 respectively. Option T2 <br />proposes installing 8-22,000 lumen lights on the existingg poles on the south side <br />of 36th Street at an annual cost of $1,401.24. This last option is not recommended <br />due to a resulting insufficient level of illumination provided. <br />Alternatives and Analysis: <br />The alternatives are: <br />1) Install lighting along Barber Ave. fran U.S. #1 to the new Hospital. <br />Annual Cost: $5,547.12 <br />2) Install lighting along 36th Street from U.S. #1 to the new Hospital. <br />Annual Cost: <br />Reccamended Plan •$1,709.40 (concrete poles) <br />Option #1 1,603.80 (wood.poles) <br />Option #2 1,401.24 <br />The iract upon providing lighting along these corridors includes improving the <br />visibility and safety for pa tients,.emergency vehicles, and physicians which use <br />this facility on a 24 hour basis. Lighting both corridors allows night safety <br />to two emergency roan access corridors. Alternatives_ may include lighting only <br />one or neither corridor. If one corridor were illuminated, 37th Street (Barber <br />Ave.) would serve the west and proposed future east approach, but at three times <br />the cost of illuminating 36th Street. <br />Alternative methods of financing include: <br />1) Set up a special street lighting district as established for the Gifford Area. <br />It may be possible to simply include this area within the Gifford District. Certain - <br />Agricultural land fronts on the roads, and it would have to be determined it this <br />land should contribute. <br />2) Approach the Hospital Board to consider paying for this service. <br />3) Provide payment from the County's 14unicipal Service Fund for the 36th Street <br />lighting and frau the Transportation Trust Fund for the 37th Street lighting <br />(Barber Ave.). <br />Recommendations and Funding: <br />Based upon past policy as implemented in the Gifford area, it is recommended <br />that a special street lighting district be considered and both 37th Street and <br />36th Street be illuminated at an annual cost of $7,256.52. Recommend that staff <br />be authorized to research the delineation of the district limits, determine the <br />taxable land value in the area, and calculate the anticipated mill -age involved. <br />Final figures shall be brought back to the Board once complete. <br />Considerable discussion followed, and it was determined <br />that this matter should be first reviewed by the Transportation <br />Planning Committee. It was suggested that the Committee might <br />want to get the Hospital Board and the City of Vero Beach <br />involved in this request. <br />APR 7 1982 aoo 4 _ <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.