Laserfiche WebLink
APR 7 1982 <br />area shown in red is precisely what the public road should <br />be. <br />Attorney Gene Roddenberry informed the Board that the <br />principal question Mr. Holmes has always had is where does <br />this road go, and until today he has never gotten a <br />definitive answer. Attorney Roddenberry felt the fact that <br />it has finally been determined that the maintenance map is <br />incorrect is the first step towards reaching a conclusion. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if Attorney Roddenberry had any <br />problem with the right-of-way as shown in red. <br />Attorney Roddenberry had no problem with that, but he <br />did have a problem with the chain of title on the subject <br />property. He_ noted that in about 1919 Harriet Thompson <br />bought this property, and upon her death, she specifically <br />devised Quay Dock Road to her two daughters; the daughters, <br />in turn; sold the entire thing to Mr. Holmes; and Mr. Holmes <br />then sold Mr. Telkamp the north one-half. Attorney <br />Roddenberry, therefore, felt the County is on property <br />belonging to both of these gentlemen. <br />Commissioner Lyons wished to know how anyone is able to <br />sell -a public road, and Attorney Roddenberry commented when <br />there is no deed -to it.to the County, how do they know who <br />owns it. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. <br />Henry Dukes and Ken Ketcham, both owners of property on <br />Quay Dock Road wished to know what would stop somebody else <br />from absorbing some of the right-of-way. <br />Richard Crippen wished to know if Mr. Holmes is <br />responsible for the sand pile blocking the road, and <br />Attorney Roddenberry felt the County had placed it there. <br />County Public Works Director Davis had no knowledge of <br />a pile of sand, but felt if there is one there, it possibly <br />78 <br />