My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/21/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
4/21/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:13:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/21/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Lyons expressed his support and thought <br />that with everyone working together, they should be able to <br />come up with something. <br />Mrs. Stephens affirmed that they do have enthusiastic <br />members in their association and they will try to get <br />everything addressed before budget time. <br />COURTHOUSE PROBLEMS - DISCUSSION. <br />Commissioner Bird suggested that Dr. C. B. Hardin, at <br />the conclusion of each week, furnish a memo to the Board <br />members in order to keep them more abreast of what was being <br />done to satisfy the Courthouse problems. <br />Dr. Hardin commented that this could be done without <br />any problem. He advised that non -allergenic carpet samples <br />had been taken to the judge for his approvals he has <br />selected a sample that he will.try in his office. <br />Commissioner Wodtke suggested leaving it in the judge's <br />office at least for a week. <br />Dr. Hardin reported that the judge felt he would be <br />able to tell -within 24 hours whether or not the carpet would <br />bother him. <br />Commissioner Bird hoped that the staff was developing a <br />complete file of all the steps that have been taken, <br />including documenting every phone call, etc., regarding this <br />problem. <br />Dr. Hardin advised that they did not deal directly with <br />the problems in writing and felt it would be better if all <br />of the messages were in writing. <br />•l <br />The Attorney recommended that any communication <br />pertinent to this problem should be in writing to avoid any <br />misunderstanding. He added that it would include such <br />things as requests on a day-to-day basis. This way, the <br />Attorney commented, they would have a definite idea, without <br />any question, of what the judges are actually telling the <br />Board. <br />�oK 49 PAGE 435 <br />APR 211982 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.