5/5/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

William Koolage, interested citizen, discussed the vehicle specifications and noted that the County was being frugal, and he was pleased. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried unanimously. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDINANCE Attorney Brandenburg requested authority to advertise for a public hearing concerning the proposed County Administrative Ordinance. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board authorize the advertisement for a public hearing concerning the County Administrative Ordinance. The Attorney stated that probably the public hearing could be scheduled for two meetings from this date. The Board then reviewed the memorandum dated April 30, 1982 from Assistant Administrator Greene, as follows: TO: Gary Brandenburg DATE: April 30, 1982 FILE: County Attorney ,/ - SUBJECT: Proposed Administrative ordinance 41. G 3 56 'r MaY 1ssz o, FROM: � � REFERENCES: s cR *""'y n, David L. Greene off;�e�11aws Assistant County Administrator Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed o� nance clarifying the duties, relationships and responsibilities involved with the various County officers. In my opinion it is brief but well written ordinance and should serve to clarify the concerns and issues that may arise in the future as to duties and responsi- bilities in the various roles of the officers of the County Government. Page two (2) of the proposed ordinance regarding appointment -comp- ensation,vacancy and removal, it would be my thought that if state law does not require an annual organizational meeting which would necessitate the reappointment of the three County officers that greater stability would be provided for the operation of the County government if it wasn't necessary to confirm and reappoint those officers on an annual basis but they be allowed to serve at the pleasure of the Commission until such time as the Commission desires a change. MAY 51982 51 paK 49 -,pAtE 5Q' F