Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />MAY 19:_1982 <br />B. Rural Sanitation Service should have the exclusive on <br />the beach because no one else has ever consistently serviced <br />the beach area except Rural Sanitation Service. <br />C. As to Section*5. Does this allow unlimited amendment <br />within the twenty year period? 4. <br />D. As to Section .6. Does this also alldw for unlimited <br />amendment within the twenty year period? What is 'reaso- <br />nable"? <br />E. As to Section 7. Printed rules and regulations are <br />fine but will cost money and raise rates. <br />F. As to Section 8. Rates should be set by the County, <br />and not allow a price war by a big company, which after <br />Rural has been bankrupted, the prices increased unreasonably <br />high and no competition. <br />f <br />G. As to Section 9. There does not appear to be any <br />restrictiozx on the number of franchises the County can <br />grant. This section only allows transfer of franchises, but <br />does not prohibit anyone from getting a new franchise. <br />H. As to Section 10. The rate should be increased because <br />of the increase in costs required by the new franchise <br />resolution. This proposed franchise will increase by 5% of <br />gross to County, increased insurance costs, bond costs, <br />bookkeeping, printing rules and regulations, etc. All of <br />this is great for the big counties with big franchises and <br />mandatory service, but they increase the costs to the <br />citizens. When this happens more people cancel the service <br />and take their garbage where they desire. <br />We would want commercial rates set by the County. It is the <br />commercial that everybody wants and now we have both cov- <br />ered. If one franchiseholder takes all the commercial, then <br />the rates of home service will skyrocket or -not be picked up <br />at all. <br />I. As to Section 13. The increase in insurance will raise <br />the costs of business. We object to the bond because of our <br />record and the cost. <br />J. As to Section 14. We object to the cost of $500.00 to <br />ask for a rate increase. <br />K. As to Section 15. Maybe the franchiseholder's rights <br />should be spelled out. <br />L. As to Section 16. Does this section make it mandatory <br />for each franchiseholder to take all customers? <br />M. As to Section 17. May want to include trash in the <br />services that are not mandatory. <br />N. As to Section 19. This section should be revised. It <br />is not practical to require•"all" garbage and trash. <br />Presently pickups are limited to two cans a pickup or two <br />bundles. This cannot be_left open-ended. <br />The last sentence dealing with wooden boxes is ambiguous. <br />All trash is picked up in bundles or cans. <br />