Laserfiche WebLink
MAS Z 6.1982 <br />envision possibly a pathway, a gazebo, or some type of <br />look -out over the river. <br />Attorney Roddenbury stated that he could only take this <br />back to Mr. Telkamp, but he did not see the type of thing <br />the Chairman is talking about as being a problem. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, to approve the settlement regarding Quay <br />Dock Road as proposed in Attorney Brandenburg''s 'letter of <br />May 11, 1982, and as modified by the wording suggested by <br />Commissioner Wodtke for Paragraph F. <br />f <br />Leon Blanton took the floor and emphasized that the <br />public believes this property belongs to the people and they <br />do not want any stipulation in the deed that will restrict <br />use of the property by the general public in the future. 'He <br />further noted that the reason the property has been in this <br />condition for the last 40 years is that the situation has <br />been so hostile, people did not use it. Mr. Blanton <br />continued that while he would not oppose it, he felt the <br />turn -around proposed in Paragraph H was a total waste of the <br />public's money. He appreciated the fact that Mr. Holmes and <br />Mr. Telkamp are working with us and did not want to waste <br />money on a court action, but felt that with an attorney as <br />competent as he believed Mr. Brandenburg to be that the jury <br />never would give away this property which belongs to the <br />public. <br />Attorney Brandenburg believed if you take into <br />consideration the amount of money that would be spent in <br />litigation vs. expending a few dollars on the package <br />settlement proposed, it is well worth it. He did believe <br />the results of the litigation'are uncertain, and that is why <br />he is recommending settlement. 1. <br />Mr. Blanton reiterated that this belongs to the County; <br />the County should be able to designate what they want to do <br />