My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/7/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
7/7/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:08:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/07/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 7 1982 50 PAU.3118 <br />index eliminating bullets with sufficient penetration would also eliminate <br />practically all bullets used by sportsmen for hunting, or homeowners.for <br />self-defense, etc. <br />Some types of ammunition may be stopped by body armour if fired from a <br />short barrel pistol (which the news media refers to as a Saturday night <br />special ) but not from a longer barrel which delivers more power to the same <br />bullet. <br />For example, the type of body armour vest I purchased for my son, will <br />stop 9m.m. pistol rounds manufactured by Winchester or Federal Cartridge <br />Companies, but will not stop 9m.m. surplus military ammunition available on <br />the market, manufactured by Canada, Czechoslovakia, West Germany or Belgium . <br />Remember the Geneva Convention on Civilized Warfare. <br />The vest will stop .357 magnum bullets, if fired from a 4" barrel <br />revolver, but not if fired from a 6" barrel. <br />Additionally, penetration is dramatically increased if the vest is wet. <br />Bullets cannot be divided into classes which will, and will not penetrate <br />body armour. <br />Given the fact that the proponants of this bullet ban have not come <br />forward with a single example of where this ammunition has been criminally <br />abused, that its cost, its restricted availability, and (prior to nation <br />wide N.B.0/TV, and C.B.S. its limited advertising - must make such mis-use <br />a rarity, there seems little reason to focus additional public attention on <br />this ammunition, much less start people thinking of ways in which to _ <br />circumvent its protection. <br />For your information, this matter was addressed in the last special <br />session of the legislature, addressing additional criminal penalties on <br />the use and possession of K.T.W. ammunition in the commission of a crime. <br />This legislation passed in the senate 39 to 0, but because the Senate and <br />Nouse bills differed, the legislature adjourned before agreement was reached. <br />The recent N.B.C./TV and C.B.S. publicity on this matter may well cost <br />the lives of some police officers, who_now decide riot to wear their vests, <br />believing it will. not stop a bullet. <br />Body armour is not bullet proof, body armour is bullet resistive. <br />i respectfully urge that we not address this issue on a county level. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.