My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
7/27/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 2 71982 50 FAUN 701 <br />ITEM #2 - EXPANSION OF COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL NODE AT I-95 <br />AND SR 60. <br />Mr. Challacombe reported that staff analyzed the need <br />for expansion of the Commercial/Industrial node at I-95 and <br />State Road 60 as requested at the last meeting. It was <br />determined that there are 138.2 acres now in use, and if the <br />approved site plan of F. M. Morency for LM were included and <br />Mr. O'Neill brought in his -site plan, there would be <br />approximately 159.06 acres in use out of a total 230. <br />Presently the text of the Land Use Plan states that there <br />shall be a maximum of 80 acres for commercial and 150 for <br />industrial in this node. Staff is not recommending a change <br />in the size of the node, but rather that the cap of 80 acres <br />for commercial be eliminated to allow for flexibility and <br />let the market determine the need. <br />Mrs. Eggert informed the Board that the Planning & <br />Zoning Commission agreed with this recommendation. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bird. to remove <br />the acreage limitations on the two uses <br />allowed in the Commercial/Industrial Node <br />at I-95 and SR 60. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if this was instigated in <br />response to the request made by Mr. O'Neill and other <br />property owners in the area, and Mr. Challacombe confirmed <br />that it was. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.