Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney William Caldwell stated this guideline would <br />be unworkable on his property. He felt the present <br />landscaping and parking requirements, etc., are sufficiently <br />restrictive and that this should be in the Zoning Code <br />rather than in the Land Use Plan. <br />Mr. Challacombe noted that this was meant for larger <br />parcels, and agreed that it may not work well on small <br />parcels such as Mr. Caldwell's. <br />Commissioner Bird felt it would be helpful if staff <br />could draw up something so the Commission could visualize <br />what we are talking about. <br />Commissioner Lyons suggested that maybe it should be <br />stated that "generally" this requires about 4.5 sq. ft., <br />which would not be so limiting. <br />Commissioner Wodtke hoped when we get everything <br />finalized there will not be too many discretionary areas <br />where we have to make a decision on a case to case basis. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed that with the annual <br />evaluation, this will be a continuing process. He did not <br />believe we can get to the end product in one shot. <br />ITEM #10 - DISCUSSION CONCERNING LAND USE ELEMENT DOCUMENT <br />A. Hospital Commercial Node Concept <br />Planning Manager Challacombe stated that basically what <br />we are looking at is a concept which would permit <br />flexibility in this area for certain commercial uses, <br />certain residential uses, and certain institutional uses. <br />For example, in a Hospital Commercial node, there would be <br />child care facilities, professional offices, hospital <br />supported facilities, residence uses, multi family units and <br />institutional units. He believed with this we could elimi- <br />nate the problems associated with the R -3A Retirement <br />District. <br />25 50 PAF 898 <br />Y I <br />