Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />Chairman Scurlock asked if it still is the Attorney's <br />recommendation that we avoid any legal action, and Attorney <br />Brandenburg was of the opinion that the Commission should <br />take a further look into the cost of the renovation and then <br />determine if they feel it is a justifiable expense. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that he would like to <br />instruct the Administrator to come back with more complete <br />costs for the proposed renovation of the Welfare Building as <br />requested by the Judge. <br />Chairman Scurlock stated that he would like to have a <br />comparison of the costs actually connected with demanding <br />the Judge return to his quarters and the expenses which <br />would be incurred in providing other quarters. He noted <br />that we have directed the Administrator to write the Judge <br />that the Courtroom has been renovated and is ready for <br />occupancy. <br />It was agreed that the Administrator should check into <br />costs and work with the City to determine what is required <br />for site plan approval on renovations to the Welfare <br />Building. <br />CHANGE ORDER FOR THE COUNTY JAIL <br />Architect John Calmes was present, and Public Works <br />Director Davis proceeded to discuss the proposal made by <br />White Electric for work at the County Jail. He felt the <br />County crew can do some concrete work to reduce this cost <br />and noted that we also can delete some light fixtures which <br />would give us the flexibility of saving $2,742. Taking <br />these factors into consideration, the change order for the <br />new amperage service would result in about a $1,500 <br />difference. Mr. Davis stated that they would like to <br />negotiate this price with the contractor, and he believed <br />they can break it down to some extent. He noted that the <br />impacts of not acting on this change order today would be to <br />77 <br />SEP 15 1982 x 51. A.GE� P <br />