Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Evans explained that they would not be pulling <br />anything out, but would just upgrade, changing the memory to <br />a larger memory; the County would get a printer plus soft- <br />ware to reroute to separate locations, and the printer is <br />included in the price. <br />Acting General Services Director Lynn Williams informed <br />the Board that the presentation today was meant to be an <br />informational type thing; staff did not receive the proposal <br />in time to do any cost analysis; and he would like to study <br />it further. He noted that there are an average 1,200-1,300 <br />calls daily, which is a big load. <br />Administrator Wright concurred that what staff desired <br />was to have the Board aware of the problems and then come <br />back with.a further analysis. <br />It was agreed that the Board needed the staff's analy- <br />sis and also would like to have some direct communication <br />from the Constitutional Officers re their problem <br />DISCUSSION RE REVISION OF SCHEDULE OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES <br />Thomas Nason, Finance Director of the City of Vero <br />Beach, commented that the rates set out in the proposed <br />resolution are essentially those from the City of Vero <br />Beach, and these were included in the budget of the Building <br />Department that was submitted prior to the end of September. <br />This is more or less a stop gap measure, but he believed it <br />is the best solution at this point without going into <br />exhaustive studies. He continued that they are -running <br />studies for the combination of the City and County Building <br />organizations, but it was his belief that the Resolution as <br />presented would keep the Building Department fiscally sound <br />until April or May when the fees would be further reviewed. <br />Mr. Nason reported that at present the Building Department <br />is losing approximately $7,000 a month. <br />OCT 2 01982 51. FA' 033 <br />