Laserfiche WebLink
NO V 3 A82 <br />9Q <br />had reached a point where it just could not afford to <br />continue with all the testing and monitoring they had done, <br />which indicated that the court facility was safe - as safe <br />as what the Judge was presently -using. Commissioner Bird <br />felt this additional expense should stop, and the Judge <br />should be asked to return to the court facility. <br />Chairman Scurlock reviewed the Motion as follows: the <br />Judge would return for all court proceedings that require <br />the services of the Clerk,in the remodeled courtroom - the <br />facility which the Board initially intended for his use, <br />with a time certain of December 1, 1982, and that the Judge <br />would have the flexibility to use the Welfare Building for <br />his office, which would not require the services of the <br />Clerk. <br />Attorney Brandenburg thought that the Motion should <br />talk in terms of the only courtroom facilities and equipment <br />that would be provided for the County Court after December 1st <br />would be Courtroom C, as opposed to telling the Judge where <br />to hold_and conduct his business. The Attorney added that <br />the Board's responsibility, under the law, was to provide <br />facilities and not tell the Judge when, how, or under what <br />circumstances to use them. <br />Commissioner Lyons AMENDED HIS MOTION to <br />indicate the only courtroom facility available <br />for Judge Stikelether's.use would be Courtroom C. <br />Commissioner Bird agreed. <br />Administrator Wright inquired if the Board wanted to <br />proceed with any improvementg, such as painting, on the <br />Welfare Building. The Board indicated a negative response. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON <br />THE MOTION, WITH AMENDMENTS. It was voted <br />on and carried unanimously. <br />� � r <br />