My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/3/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
11/3/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:40 AM
Creation date
6/4/2015 11:07:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/03/1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
possibly we should have a representative and go on record <br />through a resolution. It was generally agreed it would be <br />wise to have representation. <br />Commissioners Lyons and Wodtke withdrew their Motion <br />and second. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Fletcher, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously ap- <br />pointed Commissioner Lyons as their representative <br />to the Hutchinson Island Resource Planning and <br />Management Committee and also designated Community <br />Development Director Bruce King, or his designee. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, -SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously-_ <br />authorized the County Attorney to draft a Resolu- <br />tion as discussed, voicing our concern that we not <br />be designated an area of critical concern. <br />Local Realtor, Ed Schlitt, informed the Board that he <br />discussed this committee with Mr. Burroughs of the <br />Governor's office, who said there was no strong feelings <br />about Indian River County being included. He felt the <br />Board's thoughts would be appreciated by the Governor, and <br />believed this was not the Governor's program, but was <br />suggested through the Department of Community Affairs. <br />f <br />Jack Rose came before the Board representing Lost Tree <br />Village Corporation, and stated they can see nothing to be <br />gained by including us in the dispute of the counties to the <br />south of us. It is their position that the county has done a <br />good job and that this type of planning can be handled at <br />the local level; they fear inclusion could have an adverse <br />economic effect and felt it should be emphasized to the <br />Governor that we <br />have just developed <br />a Land Use Plan. <br />N O V 3 <br />1982 <br />84 <br />wK 51 <br />FSE 911 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.