My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/1/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
12/1/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/01/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEQ c <br />asked property owners from River Shores to stand up to <br />express their opposition to the proposed project, and about <br />60 stood up. Mr. Delgado very emotionally continued to urge <br />that the Commission vote against the rezoning. <br />Millie Weneckie, owner of several lots in River Shores, <br />wished to preserve the unique rural quality of River Shores <br />where children can come to visit and feel safe in the <br />neighborhood. She claimed that, contrary to Mr. Rogers' <br />statement, the groves have been sprayed by plan. Mrs. <br />Weneckie also emphasized that nothing is binding on <br />Southeast Enterprises and urgently requested that before any <br />rezoning is considered, the planning be in black and white <br />so they can be assured the wetlands will not be drained, <br />that the developers will put up exactly what they say, and <br />River Shores will be protected. <br />William Stegkemper, River Shores resident, and <br />professional realtor and property appraiser, urged that the <br />Board uphold the decision of the Planning & Zoning <br />Commission. It was his opinion that condominiums will have <br />a diminishing effect on residential single family value. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the fact that there - <br />will -be single family on the northern portion of the adjoining <br />property would alter his opinion, and Mr. Stegkemper felt <br />there would be less of a diminishing effect only if the <br />developer adhered to a minimum house size of 1200 sq. ft. <br />Ralph Parker, 185 12th Place, noted that this is a <br />government of the people, by the people and for the people, <br />and he believed the people have spoken their pleasure. <br />Jerry Selph, 430 12th Place, spoke at length of the <br />adverse effect of the proposed rezoning on the rural <br />character of River Shores, which has no through streets, and <br />of his realtor's promises that the marsh area never would be <br />developed and that the adjacent property would remain single <br />family. <br />He argued that any change from single family would <br />62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.