My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
12/15/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:41 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:41:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recognize a good return from his investment if the Board <br />would.consider rezoning this property to RR -2 in keeping <br />with this environmentally sensitive area, which would allow <br />him to build one unit per acre. Commissioner Fletcher <br />further disputed the statement that Mr. DeJoia can build to <br />a density of 15 units per acre now since he actually would <br />not be able to do so without a sewer plant or.water system <br />and emphasized that we must address what is, not what might <br />be. <br />Commissioner Bird asked what zoning Mr. Fletcher would <br />be comfortable with and felt would coincide with that area. <br />Mr. Fletcher stated he would recommend one unit per i <br />- _ acre, which would be R-lAA. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Fletcher, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Environmental Planner Challacombe agreed that, as <br />Commissioner Fletcher stated, the 1?75 Plan does show this <br />as an environmentally sensitive area. What is environ- <br />mentally sensitive however, is the stream itself which is <br />approximately 5-7' wide and possibly its bank which is <br />another 20' at the most, all of which falls in the setback <br />requirements and cannot be built on. <br />Commissioner Wodtke emphasized that under the <br />multi -family zoning,.each individual owner would have to go <br />through site plan approval. He stated that if he lived in a <br />mobile home, he believed he would rather see a duplex built <br />than another mobile home moved in. <br />Commissioner Fletcher emphasized that this area is not <br />a mobile home park. The trailers being discussed are <br />individually owned. Duplex living, however, is usually a <br />95 <br />DEG 15 1982 Boof 52 Fn6E 410 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.