12/15/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

K DEC 15 1992 B�aK 2 P'AUE,357 to be added in favor of the petition. She felt this hearing should be postponed. Ms. Askew stated there were no completed engineering plans on the project; she also felt it would be a financial burden. Len Spangler, 936 47th Avenue, approached the Board, and commented it was his understanding that the petition was valid; then became invalid when one person withdrew. He stated that he presented a letter from Mrs. Fuller to Mr. Davis, voting affirmatively for the project. Bill Hanson, 886 47th Avenue, came before the Board and inquired if the County would have initiated this project without the homeowners' petition. Mr. Davis responded that the County probably would not have; it was the County's position that when there is an unpaved road between two paved roads, it would be desirable to pave that one also. Mr. Hanson discussed the drainage, swales and cut-throughs to the back ditches; he also felt the road the County planned to construct, with an inverted crown, would be an experimental road. He felt the petition was invalid, and was against the paving on that principle. •-- Discussion followed regarding whether the petition was based on 2/3 or more of the land owners being in favor, or if were based on 2/3 or more of the lands involved. Mr. Davis stated it could be either way, but he figured the lineal feet amounted to 70.10%, which was enough. He commented that staff had not developed detailed engineering projects on the other four roads at this time; they were trying to prioritize their work. Mr. Davis noted that as far as an inverted crown road being experimental, it was not; they would have to study the area to determine which method to use. Mary Perrotta, 4760 8th Place, approached the Board, and briefly discussed the bad drainage in the area.