My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/5/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1/5/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:59 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:43:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/05/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attorney Calvin Brown came before the Board <br />representing Robert Fisher and emphasized that this property <br />is within an industrial node as designated in the Master <br />Plan, and the rezoning would be compatible with the <br />surrounding area. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. There were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously <br />closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, to <br />adopt Ordinance 83-5 rezoning the subject <br />property from C-lA to M-1 as requested by <br />Robert Fisher. <br />Commissioner Fletcher had questions re the nodal <br />concept and wished to know if there could not be a time <br />element within which this zoning had to be utilized. <br />Attorney Brandenburg commented that some communities <br />have a rule that if the rezoning is not used within a <br />certain time, the zoning reverts back, but that has been <br />held improper. He pointed out that when the Board <br />designates a zoning use, they make a decision based on the <br />best use of that land, and to go back and change that <br />zoning, you have to show what circumstances have changed <br />since the previous decision; there must be back-up to <br />substantiate that the node, for instance, is developing in a <br />way that was not anticipated. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />61 <br />JAN 5 1983 K 52 `FAaE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.