Laserfiche WebLink
they are anticipating redoing the interior electric, and <br />adding a new air conditioning system for that area, plus <br />some additional plumbing; they are, in effect, starting with <br />a shell and will have to do some demolition work. <br />Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the importance of <br />covering the walkway just to afford protection from the <br />elements. Mr. Calmes reported that everyone he had <br />interviewed had agreed that covering the walkway would be a <br />tremendous asset in achieving maximum utilization of the <br />facility. This would not only facilitate access for the <br />handicapped, but would serve to make the two structures into <br />one complex, providing more waiting room area, restrooms, <br />deposition rooms, etc. It was generally felt we must decide <br />what the trade-off benefits are to justify the expenditure <br />involved in covering the walkway. <br />The Chairman then proceeded to review Mr. Calmes <br />presentation page by page. <br />Question was raised on the following items: <br />Page 4 - the need for a telephone for the Judge and also an <br />alarm button in the Courtroom. It was noted there was a <br />disparity of opinion on this. <br />Page 5 - Whether the furniture listed was included in the <br />estimated price. It was explained that the furniture that <br />is itemized is included in that price, but the built-ins are <br />considered as being part of the construction budget. <br />Page 6 - Whether we have the overall space needed to <br />separate the various functions. Mr. Calmes stated the <br />primary dimension is the width of the courtroom as opposed <br />to the depth, and he believed there is sufficient space <br />overall. <br />Page 7 - the need for storage area. It was explained that <br />the evidence storage is intended for temporary storage of <br />documents, exhibits, etc., while court is in recess. <br />81 tH( FA'E I I <br />JAN 5 1983 <br />