2/2/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M M M On July 22, 1982, the Luria's Plaza site plan received.approval subject to five conditions. Two of these five conditions were that: 1) the subdivision procedure be followed, as per the County's Subdivision Ordinance 75-3, since three parcels are being created, 2) the traffic circulation be slightly amended to meet the approval of the County Traffic Engineer. The developers of Luria's Plaza have submitted a pxeaixminary plat which shows the three parcels which they are er.e4ting as a result of their development. They are requesting preliminary plat approval, as per the conditions of their site plan ap- proval, and staff has reviewed their plat as per the County's Subdivision Ordinance 75-3. It should be mentioned that the second condition oftheir site plan approval listed herein, amending the traffic circulation on site to meet the approval of the County Traffic Engineer, has not yet been met. The applicants have discussed recom- mended changes with the Traffic Engineer, but have not complied with all the changes which the Traffic Engineer has requested, nor have they submitted amended drawings reflecting any changes which have been made on site. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: Section 3 (A) states that: (3b) of the County's Subdivision Ordi.nan.ce 75-3 "The Board, in studying the preliminary plat, will take into consideration the requirements of the community and the best use of the land being subdivided. Particular attention will be given to width, arrangement and location of streets, lot sizes and arrangements, as well as requirements for school sites, public building sites, parkways and highways. Adequate street connections will be required to ensure free access to and circulation for adjoining subdivisions and lands." In conformance with this section of the subdivision regulations staff has made the following recommendations: 1) During the initial subdivision review, a drainage easement was provided along the northern border of the property to allow access to a portion of the drainage system on the site. Since that time, the Planning Department has received correspondence indicating that this pipeline is being put in a different location than shown on the original site plan. For that reason it is recommended that the drainage easement shown on the preliminary plat be relocated to correspond with the actual location of the pipe. 2) Because of the subdivision's size, location and the type of development involved, it is recommended that the developer install one street light at the entrance of the proposed shopping plaza at U.S.#1 and one street light at the intersection of 10th Avenue and 17th Street. 3) Also, because of the impact which a development of this size would have on the traffic on U. S. #1, it is recommended that some method of facilitating ingress and egress to the proposed subdifvision be provided by the developer. 34a FEB 2 1983 t 2 PnE 741