My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/2/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
3/2/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:55:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/02/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 2 19- 909 <br />Mr. Pinto noted that the Board previously authorized <br />determining the value of the property adjoining the Land- <br />fill, and it has been appraised at $119,230• Mr. Pinto <br />stressed that there is going to be a specific need for this <br />property; it will enhance the operation of the landfill; and <br />he urged that the Commission give serious consideration to <br />purchasing it. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if this would put us in <br />such a negative position that we could not consider a future <br />landfill in the north of the County. <br />Mr. Pinto stated that he has,/some real concern over the <br />future operation of our landfill as it exists now. There <br />are changes coming along rapidly in how we Vre going to have <br />to operate the landfill, and he felt if we want to take the <br />present landfill to its life expectancy, we will need this <br />property whether we eventually have two landfills or not. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, to authorize <br />staff to start negotiations for the property <br />recommended by the Utilities Director for <br />expansion of the Sanitary Landfill. <br />Chairman Bird felt part of the problem is because the <br />hardpan under the existing landfill property is not what we <br />thought, and he wished to know if we are sure the adjacent <br />property would be suitable. <br />Mr. Pinto noted that the DER is saying the hardpan is <br />not adequate for a landfill without a liner. This new site <br />could be used at least for a borrow pit, and he believed <br />that would be the prime use of the land. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />55 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.