Laserfiche WebLink
of $15,300.00, but would settle for return of their <br />$15,300.00 without interest, and they will pay their <br />own attorney s fees. <br />Please let me know as soon as possible whether <br />this is acceptable to the County. <br />CLC: eh <br />cc: Joseph Fidele <br />Very truly yours, <br />Carol L. Connell <br />AttoAney Brandenburg continued that the developer has <br />stated that these roads do not serve as ingress and egress <br />to the subdivision ,And they do not use those roads at any <br />time. As part of the case, the developer has delineated all <br />of the other subdivisions approved where no monies were <br />requested and he has built up an inverse condemnation case. <br />The Attorney continued that at the particular time when this <br />subdivision was approved, the Planning Department, under <br />former Planning Director Rever, was maintaining that all the <br />roads that had to be dedicated had to be paved, or if not, <br />the money for the paving had to be escrowed. Staff now has <br />done some research and found that since 1974 there were two <br />subdivisions where escrow funds were involved, and 47 where <br />other roads were required, but no road paving was required. <br />54 <br />MAR 16 1983 <br />