Laserfiche WebLink
facility is available, and give them some idea of the cost <br />involved. <br />The Motion died for lack of a second. <br />Administrator Wright raised the question of whether we <br />want to single out just these two subdivisions since we have <br />the same situation in Gifford. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt it would be appropriate to <br />have the Utility Department schedule a town meeting and do a <br />bit of education re what we are doing in terms of service <br />and time table as well as explain this is not a situation we <br />created. <br />Discussion continued at length re mandatory hook-up for <br />both water and sewer, and Commissioner Lyons suggested that <br />the Utility Department come back to us with their suggestion <br />about how this situation should be.handled. The Board <br />agreed. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST FROM THE TOWN OF INDIAN <br />RIVER SHORES <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/15/83: <br />E TO The Honorable Members DATE: June 15, 1983 FILE: <br />of the Board of <br />County Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />14�- *- L/ - - &,j SUBJECT: <br />Patrick Bruce Ki g, AICP <br />THROUGH: Bob Keating, AICP <br />Planning & Zoning Dept. Manager <br />Clare Z. Poupard <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT REQUEST FROM THE <br />TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES <br />FROM: Planner I 0 REFERENCES: <br />It is requested that the information presented herein be given <br />formal consideration by the Board of -County Commissioners at <br />their regular meeting on July 6, 1983. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Community Development Division -began accepting Comprehensive <br />Plan amendment applications on May 16, 1983, as part of its <br />legally required plan amendment process. On June 6, 1983, a <br />letter was submitted to the County from the Town of Indian River <br />37 <br />JUL ` ���3 x 53 racy ��.7 <br />1 <br />