Laserfiche WebLink
The City/County, and IRFDD have not entered into a formal three - <br />party agreement, however, the City and County are basically using the <br />study in replacement and new development conditions. <br />The alternatives presented are: <br />Alternative 1) <br />Approve final payment in the amount of $2,192.50 and consider R.S.$ <br />H.'s work satisfactory as per the October, 1980 agreement. <br />Alternative 2) <br />Withhold final payment until further comment from DER, but transmit <br />a partial payment in the amount of $822.52 for Invoice #9 revised. <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is recommended that Alternative No. 2 be approved whereby partial <br />payment be made in the amount of $822.52 and that Final Payment in the <br />amount of $1,369.98 be made at the time that final comment is received <br />from DER. It is recommended that the City/County Drainage Study be approved <br />as a '"Tentative Master Plan" for the study area in questions. Funding <br />to be from Account No. 001-101-511-33.19. Balance as of July 8, 1983 <br />is $4,695.00. <br />Public Works Director Davis brought the Board up to <br />date on the status of the City/County Drainage Study. <br />He explained that Reynolds, Smith & Hills is requesting <br />final payment and that staff recommendation is that of <br />Alternative #2 that we go ahead and pay Reynolds, Smith & <br />Hills another partial payment of $822.52 leaving a balance <br />of $1,369.98 to be paid at the time that final comment is <br />received from the DER and that the City/County Drainage <br />Study be approved as "Tentative Master Plan" for the study <br />area in question. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, that the <br />Board accept staff recommendation <br />and approve Alternate #2, as outlined in <br />the memo dated 7/12/83. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock indicated that <br />he is not particularly happy with the whole progress of this <br />study from 1980 to the present and thought that there was <br />some significant problems with this study. <br />24 <br />JUL 0 X93i�a5.4 PAS n <br />