My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/3/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
8/3/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:01 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:04:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/03/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 3 1983 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the <br />Board unanimously approved preliminary site <br />plan of Forest Lake, Unit II Subdivision. <br />PROPOSED FEE INCREASES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION <br />ACTIVITIES <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/26/83: <br />TO: The Honorable Members DATE: July 26, 1983 <br />of the Board of <br />County Commissioners <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE <br />PROPOSED FEES FOR <br />_ SUBJE�;T: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />Patrick Bruce King AICP DIVISION ACTIVITIES <br />THROUGH: Bob Keating, AICP.az <br />Planning & Zoning Dept. Manager <br />Clare Z. Poupard C 'P DW:MON <br />1`'Ii0m: Planner I REFERENCES: Proposed Fees <br />It is requested that the information presented herein he given <br />formal conside;:ation by the Board of County Commissioners at <br />their regular meeting on August 3, 1983. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS <br />Pursuant to the Board's request at the budget hearing, the <br />Connnunity Development Division has prepared a proposal for <br />increasing the fees which are charged for development review - <br />related activities within the Division. <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />The proposed new fees in Attachment 1 represent Alternative 3, <br />as it was presented to the Board of County Commissioners at <br />their budget hearings. This 3rd alternative was tentatively <br />`pproved by the Board at the hearings. Attachment 2 is the <br />Community Development Division's work program for fisca) year <br />1983-84. This work program shows the cost, in staff time, of <br />completing the Division's development revievz-related work. As <br />this work program indicates, the staff time spent in reviewing <br />applications, etc., costs more than is recouped in the fees <br />which are charged for the ie-i;icwv <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County adopt <br />the new fees listed in Attachment 1. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.