My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/7/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
12/7/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:03 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:50:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/07/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
objected to any abandonment of plats. He felt this would be <br />impossible because of the sales that were made back in the <br />early 1960s. Mr. Clem stated that although his clients <br />realize they have problems and something needs to be done, <br />they feel adopting the proposed ordinance in order to.fund a <br />study would result in duplicate taxation. He suggested that <br />the County proceed with looking at the overall situation, <br />and although his clients object to forming a MSTU at this <br />time, they are willing to sit down and -work with the County <br />towards some solution. <br />Chairman Bird asked Attorney Clem is his clients would <br />be willing to give some financial assistance for a study and <br />Directory Davis interjected that the study is not something <br />that can be done quickly; it would probably take one or two <br />years, and he was not quite sure what it would cost. <br />Mr. Clem felt that his clients could be of some <br />financial assistance, but since people are paying County <br />taxes, the County should fund some part of this study. He <br />did not see this as an emergency situation. <br />Joe McBride,. a resident of Vero Lakes Estates for the <br />last 2k years, felt a lot of the maintenance work that has <br />been done by the County, is not satisfactory and they have <br />had to come back and redo it. Mr. McBride noted that there <br />are many houses out there that are owned as homestead <br />exemptions and these owners are the ones raising the most <br />objection. He felt that the County Attorney should prepare <br />a resolution to present to the State Legislature asking that <br />they pass a statute requiring every taxpayer to pay taxes on <br />the first $25,000 of assessed value, which would be fair to <br />everyone. <br />Chairman Bird agreed that the Legislature should <br />address the homestead exemption requirements, but, <br />unfortunately, it is a very unpopular issue. <br />53 <br />DEC 7 1983 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.