Laserfiche WebLink
find it still makes sense, we should stay with it, and if it <br />doesn't, we should change it. <br />Attorney Paull agreed that we don't want to go through <br />the expense of a suit to enjoin their operation, if we <br />decide that they are, in fact, not processing plants. <br />Discussion followed as to the district in which this <br />processing is allowed, and Attorney Paull stated it is <br />allowed in a restricted Industrial District only. They are <br />in C-1 Commercial right now, and basically what they are <br />doing is squeezing juice from raw fruit. <br />Commissioner Lyons believed there is a matter of degree <br />involved. <br />Attorney Brandenburg suggested that if the Board does <br />wish to review the Ordinance, they instruct his office to <br />attempt to have the lawsuits stayed by stipulation until the <br />County can conduct their review; this would save a lot of <br />money. <br />Commissioner Wodtke and Commissioner Bowman withdrew <br />their Motion. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Lyons, to instruct the County <br />Attorney's office to attempt to obtain a stipula- <br />tion to stay proceedings in the actions and stay <br />enforcement proceedings in the lawsuits of Davis & <br />Vero Beach. Groves vs. Indian River County and <br />Campbell Food & Spirits & Plasse vs. Indian River <br />County until the County Commission reviews the defi- <br />nition of "processing" under the Zoning Code; that <br />review to occur within the next several months. <br />Discussion arose as to any health problems that might <br />be created by this delay. <br />49 <br />MAR 71984 <br />BW %JV PAGE 327 <br />