4/4/1984 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r RPR 41984 BOOK 56 ?AGE63T Commissioner Wodtke brought up indirect cost allocation and noted the report states this will be based on the County's indirect cost allocation plan which is currently being finalized. He asked if staff is saying their figure is not the final figure for the indirect cost. Mr. Raftelis stated that they used the budget figure of approximately $100,000. Commissioner Wodtke asked if Mr. Raftelis felt that figure was a reasonable one. He just wanted to be sure we are not overloading this enterprise account with general and overhead expenses. Mr. Raftelis assured him that they did review these figures and felt they were very reasonable. Commissioner Wodtke next raised a question about the $110,000 for contractual services under General Adminis- trative costs, and asked if there are going to be continuing ongoing contractural services from year to year. Administrator Wright stated that this was a budget item and this year it will be higher because we will be doing the water and sewer master planning. He believed these services will continue and it is hard to determine what they will be. Commissioner Wodtke continued to discuss the amount for contractural services, and Administrator Wright pointed out that these amounts will be reviewed in three months at budget sessions. Commissioner Wodtke wished to know what the change is A w. _�.... , ...4.,., in the mandatory connection on water and sewer. Attorney Brandenburg stated that the only change is that we have included language which provides that, in the event an individual is creating some kind of health hazard, we can require them to hook up to a private franchise utility as well as a county utility system. Commissioner Wodtke next asked what the monthly bill would be for someone who has purchased multi -family water 22