5/23/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Scurlock noted that another problem is that easements may be needed from Vista, and Mr. Pinto believed there is no question about that. He felt our position however, is that if some private entity wants to connect, they have to be in a position to pay all the costs to do so - and to jump all the hurdles to get to that point, and if they can do this, Mr. Pinto stated that he would much rather see that happen than build another plant. Chairman Scurlock felt there is no question that in the long haul what we are going to look at is another plant in the South County and an eventual phasing out of the Vista plant. Mr. Pinto agreed, and stated his concern is that it will be easier to phase out two plants than ten plants. Question arose about sewer service for the commercial property that Vista retained in front of Vista Royale, and Mr. Pinto stated that everything Vista owns is supposedly to be served by that system. Discussion ensued regarding the plants' capacity, and Attorney Brandenburg reported that Vista guaranteed us 100,000 gallons of capacity out of the combination of the Vista Royale and the Vista Gardens facilities. However, there is a clause in the agreement which indicated that in the event Vista did not build out to its maximum expansion, that it would not be responsible for the failure of the system to provide that guaranteed amount. Discussion continued at length re the property on which Mr. Lyon wishes to build a restaurant, among other things, and Chairman Scurlock felt there are many parallel situations in the county - for instance, the proposed restaurant on the Moon property on SR 60 where we are moving ahead with a subregional system in cooperation with various developers. He felt if Mr. Lyon had assurance through our master plan that we are, in fact, going to be able to MAY 2 3 1984 79 BOOK 517 PACE 242