Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 2 3 1994 Boa 57 FAcc 1 <br />stated to this Commission that he had purchased a new plant <br />that would complete the build out in the Moorings. He <br />stated then that they had ordered a new plant and it was in <br />Jacksonville. He felt that if the Commission had held Mr. <br />Aiello to his word then, before issuing the franchise, this <br />hearing would not be necessary. The Moorings Property <br />Owners Association would like to see the Board delay this <br />matter until such time that a meeting can be held with the <br />City Council to work out something more satisfactory than a <br />new plant that is going to cost the customers, and <br />ultimately, the taxpayers a lot more money. <br />Attorney Dorothy Hudson expressed the concern of the <br />Moorings in regard to the time element. They hoped that <br />Hutchinson Utilities will be able to move this plant as soon <br />as possible, as they had anticipated that it was to be moved <br />long before this. She objected to the type of time elements <br />discussed today, up to three months, or something that <br />delays the plant being moved until next year. That type of <br />delay is totally unacceptable to the Moorings. She feared <br />that future development may not receive sewer treatment <br />service and urged the Commission to do everything possible <br />to do this in a timely fashion. <br />Chairman Scurlock reminded Attorney Hudson that the <br />basic problem in itself began with the Moorings. <br />Attorney Hudson agreed that it was a Moorings problem, <br />but again pointed out the necessity of having effluent for <br />the golf course. <br />Dr. Arthur E. Rappoport, a resident of the Moorings who <br />has a son attending St. Edward's School, spoke of the <br />dangers associated with aerosols and diseases. As a former <br />pathologist, he was concerned about the potential health <br />hazards, and believed the political bodies involved should <br />get together and resolve the problem. <br />62 <br />