6/6/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 6 1984 BOOK 57 FACE314 Planning & Zoning Commission as a member. Apparently this will require attendance at weekly meetings, and he felt it should state "chairman or designee." Mrs. Eggert agreed. Discussion followed as to approving the proposed changes, but scheduling this to be looked at again in six months or so. Tom Culler, Chairman of the Construction Industry Management Council (CIMC), expressed the Council's belief that this is a good streamlining process. They are especially hopeful that the Technical Review Committee may afford them the opportunity to learn on the day they submit an application exactly what Planning & Zoning Commission agenda they will be on, which, in turn, will enable them to give their clients more specific information. Mr. Culler felt if everything went smoothly, site plan approval could be obtained within 32 weeks, and this would really be a welcome change. There are some other changes they would like considered, but he believed the Planning & Zoning Commission felt it should have the Board's consent before moving ahead on these. Chairman Scurlock assured Mr. Culler that the Commission wishes to do everything possible to streamline this process and noted that he is particularly interested in paralleling activities wherever possible rather than having to move from A to B to C, etc. Planning Director Keating felt the changes Mr. Culler is referring to relate to having the county go to a conceptual site plan approval process. He continued that he would like authorization to do an analysis on this from the staff point of view. Mrs. Eggert agreed this was worth investigation, and clarified that by "conceptual," the contractors are saying that they would like to be able to some in with a pian that will set out what is needed without having to go to actual 52