6/6/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TO: The Honorable Members DATE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: May 30, 1984 SUBJECT: FILE: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL AND VARIANCE REQUEST FOR PINECREST III SUBDIVISION ' . _J��A 6 k Robert M. keatin , Al Planning & Developmen Director FROM: Clare Z. Poupard /fIf REFERENCES: Pinecrest III Staff Planner J DIS:CLARE It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting on June 6, 1984. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Pinecrest #3 Subdivision is comprised of 32 lots on a ±10 acre site.. The development is located west of Old Dixie Highway and north of 4th Street. The .subject property is zoned R-1 (6.2 dwelling units/acre) and has a LD -2 land use designation (6 dwelling units/acre). The project's proposed density is 3.2 dwelling units/acre. The applicant received preliminary plat approval on September 2, 1981. This approval would have elapsed on March 2, 1983. However, the applicant received a six month extension, and thus, preliminary plat approval expired on September 2, 1983. Therefore, the applicant is making a two -fold request. The applicant is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners grant a variance from the time limit provision of the County's subdivision ordinance, and that the Board of County Commission- ers subsequently grant final. plat approval to Pinecrest #3 Subdivision. V ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The first request made by the applicant is for a variance from the time limit provision of the County's Subdivision Ordinance. According to the provisions of Section A(3)(g) of the County's Subdivision Ordinance 75-3, (the ordinance which was in effect at the time that the Pinecrest III Subdivision preliminary plat approval request was submitted and approved), "g) The following limitations and conditions are placed on the preliminary plat approvals given by the Board: (1) The approval of the Board shall have full force and effect for a period of 18 months from the date of approval. An extension may be granted by the Board. (2) If no final plat has been filed for the area covered by the preliminary plat before the approval period has elapsed, the approval shall be revoked. If final plats are filed for only a portion of the preliminary plat, the approval on the remaining portions shall be revoked unless an extension of time has been granted by the Board." As the ordinance states, if a final plat has not been filed before the preliminary plat approval expires, plat approval becomes null and void. However, the proposed Pinecrest III 57 JUN6 I9 4 BOOK 57 PAUE319