My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
8/22/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
acres on the west side of 98th Avenue. He did not believe <br />that staff is saying this is not a good place for industrial <br />activity, but just that based on the size of the node, there <br />is no acreage available. <br />Commissioner Lyons noted that about a week ago the <br />Commission came to the conclusion that we ought to rethink <br />these nodes and set hard lines, and he, therefore, wondered <br />whether action on this node at this time is not a bit out of <br />phase as it could be that we will decide this node will be <br />larger and could encompass this property. <br />Planning Director Keating agreed and stated that staff <br />would be amenable to putting this off until they can develop <br />the new nodal concept. <br />Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that to go into an <br />actual expansion, it is necessary to go through the <br />Comprehensive Plan process. There is some language in the <br />Plan, however, that would allow the Commission some <br />flexibility in regard to the issue today. <br />Commissioner Bird did not feel it is unreasonable to <br />anticipate that this property could be used for commercial <br />or industrial, and since it seems we don't have the acreage <br />available to give them, he believed we would have to start <br />the process to expand the node. <br />Chairman Scurlock pointed out that another option is to <br />use the part of the Comprehensive Plan referred to by the <br />Attorney. <br />Commissioner Lyons asked if denial of this request <br />would be the same as a zoning denial where the applicant <br />would be prohibited from reapplying for a year. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that the current request <br />which is to include property within a node, is different <br />than a rezoning, and if the Board should deny them today, <br />they would be able to come back under the new policy that is <br />being developed. <br />27 <br />AUG 2 2 1984 BOOK 58<,e:T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.