My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/5/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
9/5/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:25 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/05/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 58 FA�F150 <br />not want heavy industry. He agreed Mr. O'Haire has a right <br />to use his property but they would like to have a buffer and <br />another access. <br />Administrator Wright felt there is a 60' right of way <br />between the Morrisey Property (M.A.Ford Co.) and Rampmaster, <br />and Mr. Shearer agreed there is space there for a road. <br />Mr. O'Haire confirmed that they can develop the <br />property by another access and not use 100th Avenue. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt the residents should be aware <br />that at sometime in the future they may very well end up <br />being surrounded by commercial uses. He pointed out that <br />one option they have would be to ask to have their property <br />included in the node and then sell it. Pressure for indus- <br />trial property undoubtedly will increase as the County <br />grows, and it is a question of how long they can be pro- <br />tected. <br />Mr. Edwards confirmed that they do realize this can <br />happen in the future. <br />Commissioner Bird asked Mr. O'Haire if he could live <br />with LM -1 rather than a more intense use, and Mr. O'Haire <br />stated that he had no interest in heavier uses. <br />Commissioner Bird asked the Attorney if we can amend <br />this rezoning request to LM -1 since it is a less intense <br />use, and Attorney Paull confirmed that the Commission could <br />do so but stated that if it is intended to act on this <br />favorably, the Board will have to make a definite finding <br />either that it is in the node or that it is one of those <br />type of properties which for some special circumstance or <br />condition ought to be rezoned commercial or industrial and <br />that it is not in the node. <br />Timothy Nowak, resident of the area, echoed Mr. <br />Edwards' sentiments and spoke of his enjoyment of the area. <br />He did agree that the subdivision will be surrounded at <br />sometime in the future, but pointed out that the grove next <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.