Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />that he probably would vote against this site plan because <br />of the difficulty in exiting. He did believe, however, that <br />the property eventually would be used for commercial as he <br />does not envision it being used for residential, but <br />whatever commercial use is finally located on this site will <br />have to find some way not to create such a hazardous traffic <br />situation as he thought this site plan would. <br />Attorney Brandenburg read from the provisions in the <br />site plan ordinance which state that the Commission shall <br />not approve a site plan unless it finds that such site plan <br />conforms to all applicable provisions of the zoning <br />ordinance, that the safety and convenience of the public are <br />properly provided for, that adequate offstreet parking and <br />loading facilities are provided for owners., tenants, <br />visitors and employees and that adequate protection and <br />separation are provided for contiguous nearby residential <br />property. <br />ON,MOTION by Commissioner Bird, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board <br />unanimously approved the appeal of the Vista <br />Royale Association and denied the approval <br />of Royale Garden Village site plan for the <br />reason that the site plan does not deal <br />satisfactorily with the traffic safety. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING ORD. 72-8 - TEMPORARY <br />U �J UTILITY PERMITS ( Continued from 9/5/84) <br />tyk <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that this I a` rovision <br />modifying the current ordinance which presently states that <br />prior to an individual obtaining a utility permit he must <br />have a franchise. In some of the areas of the County where <br />the County is planning an immediate expansion, this creates <br />65 <br />SEP 19 1984 ROOK9 PAG ,87 <br />