My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/14/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11/14/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:54:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/14/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N 0 V 14 1984 ��ra�Y <br />expense of going through the process, vacating any other plats, <br />and doing a formal plat for what it is. <br />Commissioner Wodtke stressed his concern that with the rest <br />of the subdivision zoned the same way, we could end up with 60 or <br />80 septic tanks, and Mr. Galanis confirmed that according to <br />current state law, under separate ownership and a separate <br />development, this could happen. <br />Attorney Brandenburg informed the Board that the county has <br />informed this developer that he must plat in advance any more <br />divisions in that subdivision. If he plats this in advance,. the <br />likelihood of being able to obtain a septic tank permit from the <br />state is nil. <br />Discussion ensued about ownership, and Commissioner Wodtke <br />asked if it is not true that these four lots are all under the <br />same owner as the listing on the back taxes show Frank Zorc as <br />Trustee; it was believed that Mr. Zorc has now sold all this off. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked how Mr. Zorc could sell it if it <br />isn't subdivided, and Planning Director Keating stated that <br />actually it is a 1/2 acre lot subdivision. <br />Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that there are buildings <br />that go right across the lot line; in fact the buildings actually <br />don't even line up with the lot lines. <br />Director Keating explained that the developer came in for <br />the first three lots and part of the fourth lot all together as <br />one parcel; a site plan was approved for that parcel; and at that <br />time the owner said he would not sell the units - they would be <br />rental units. Subsequently it was found out that he was selling <br />each unit and conveying land with each. It also has been learned <br />recently that, even after we informed the applicant that he is <br />violating the law by selling any more of these units without plat <br />approval, he has sold at least one more lot. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the feeling that there should be <br />some way to fine someone who just disregards a county ordinance. <br />28 <br />M - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.