My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/28/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11/28/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 9:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/28/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N O V 28 1994 BOOK 59 PAGE 64- <br />barrier <br />4-barrier island in accordance with the densities shown on the Comp <br />Plan. <br />Chairman Scurlock agreed that the ultimate final solution is <br />having a vehicle in place for making the necessary improvements <br />so that we can go ahead and develop our master plan as written. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the overall HIMP plan is <br />applicable to all the units of government in the planning area, <br />There was a determination made by the DCA that the City of Vero <br />Beach lands were already replatted , and as a result, they did <br />not have any undeveloped land remaining in area. Consequently, <br />these two particular requirements of the transportation part of <br />the plan do not apply to them. They do apply to Indian River <br />Shores, the Town of Orchid and all the other municipalities in <br />the planning area, and those cities have to take it on themselves <br />to comply with the plan. The actual wording of the plan states <br />that no development of any kind will be allowed to proceed in the <br />northern traffic zone until the DCA approves an allocation plan <br />for that whole northern area. The approach the County has taken <br />in the proposed ordinance is that there are 6500 trips available <br />in the northern district on the Wabasso Bridge and when you take <br />the amount of buildable acreage remaining in the northern district <br />and divide that into the number of trips, it comes out to a <br />number considerably less than one unit per acre. The intent of <br />the plan, which is evident in the way they have applied it to the <br />southern 3 district, is that even if you are over capacity, you <br />can still develop at one unit per acre. Therefore, what we are <br />saying is that while we presently are not over capacity, we are <br />going to put the restriction of one unit per acre on it now. <br />That, in effect, allocates all the available trips on the Wabasso <br />Bridge. The DCA's representative did not see anything wrong with <br />that approach, but could not actually approve it either. <br />Chairman Scurlock at this point recommended that we move <br />ahead with the resolution and ordinance, and asked for input from <br />those in the audience. <br />64 <br />_ M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.