My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/28/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11/28/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:26 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 9:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/28/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 28 1984 <br />BOOK 59 WF. <br />put it into effect, we are going to hand carry it up to the DCA, <br />wave it at them, and tell them we are well aware of what they <br />want and that they are wasting their time trying to develop all <br />these rules for us. This may stop the process, but he suspected <br />that they would not stop the process until the ordinance is <br />actually adopted. He noted that the County Commission also has <br />• to adopt a resolution by January 11th indicating how they are <br />going to address other areas in the plan such was wastewater, <br />potable water, etc. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked what assistance we are receiving <br />from our legislative delegation and Chairman Scurlock reported <br />that they are going to meet in Indian River County in January and <br />we should make our concerns clear to them at that time. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the state legislature <br />has the power to overrule this designation, but it is.very <br />unlikely that would happen. <br />Nancy Offutt asked if the PRDs was passed, could they be <br />utilized on these properties, and Attorney Brandenburg thought <br />that would be a good way to accomplish the phasing. <br />Mrs. Offutt also asked if density transfers in the PRD would <br />still be applicable and Attorney Brandenburg did not believe the <br />HIMP designates the environmentally sensitive area as being <br />buildable acreage. <br />Arthur Perruzzi, President of the Board of Realtors, asked <br />about the taxing procedures on the property affected by the <br />moratorium and Chairman Scurlock felt that was of tremendous <br />concern. He viewed it as an opportunity to work together as he <br />certainly did not want the County to lose any tax base. <br />Tom Hargett asked about water and sewer being contingent <br />upon the HIMP, and Chairman Scurlock explained that they are <br />included in the plan, but basically, the Commission, as well as <br />the DCA, feels those matters will be less difficult to handle. <br />: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.