Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 6 1995 aooN6, 0F,;c Q7 <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that part of this road is <br />unique and a 30' right-of-way limits what can be done. <br />Mr. Dritenbas believed need will dictate if it ever gets <br />wider, and that is a possibility. As to 700 cars using this <br />street and the proportionate formula, he asked that the Board <br />remember those who live on this unpaved street have no other <br />choice but to use it while for others, he believed it will become <br />an A1A to the west. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) <br />closed the public hearing. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by <br />Commissioner Bowman, that for all the reasons stated and because <br />this falls in an in-between classification, the petition formula <br />be changed in this particular case to 60% County 40% resident; <br />the recommended adjustments re Silver Oaks Estates and the <br />Perkins property to be implemented as discussed. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that he did believe this project <br />was expedited specifically to help push the project Mr. Schlitt <br />spoke of and while he appreciated the offering of the engineering <br />services, he did not feel, even if we adjust the formula, we <br />should saddle other people on the roll with the cost of that <br />engineering. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that he was accepting the <br />engineering as a donation and that's why it wasn't part of the <br />Motion. <br />Administrator Wright commented that the Board knew his <br />position and he still felt if the Board changes their policy, <br />they are putting staff in a very difficult position. He believed <br />the Board is now saying that they will take each road on a case <br />by case basis, which he felt is a mistake. <br />