Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Scurlock noted that any decision can be <br />appealed, and Commissioner Bird stated that he did agree that the <br />50/50 formula is right for the normal, average collector road. <br />Commissioner Bowman did believe that when this is paved, we <br />will see tremendous growth and later will be assessing impact <br />fees. <br />Administrator Wright asked if the Board wished to take this <br />money out of Petition Paving because that account is set up on <br />certain ratios and this would be hurting that account. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we should take the difference out of <br />our 5th and 6th Cent Gas Tax Fund. He noted that he is not sure <br />what the proper percentage is because it is a judgment call; it <br />could be 70/30 or 60/40. <br />Chairman Lyons believed it is important to try to be as near <br />right as we can be. He felt certain this road is going to get a <br />whale of a lot more through traffic than some others we are <br />thinking about and as we do not yet have the Impact Fee Ordinance <br />in place, he felt we may be asking the people in the existing <br />subdivisions to pay a little more than is justified; he, <br />therefore, would lean towards a 70/30 ratio. <br />Administrator Wright suggested that we just junk the <br />petition; make this paving a priority based on need; and let the <br />County assume the whole cost. The Board today is telling him <br />that there is a definite need for this road - not to accommodate <br />the people who live there since they seem to be fairly happy, but <br />to accommodate development and traffic for the shopping center, <br />etc. He urged that we not jeopardize the Petition Paving <br />Program. <br />Commissioners Scurlock and Bowman withdrew their Motion. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, to adjust the formula for <br />the assessment roll to 70/30 in this particular <br />57 <br />BOOK 0 FAr,E <br />MAR 6 1985 <br />